Welcome back to CMJ,
Quick question before we get started: do you like magic? I certainly do.
Although I’m not a magician, I find it fascinating how well a ‘misdirection’ technique works.
This week, China showed its rare earth ‘magic’, disclosing increased rare earth exports, while completely drying out the source to a major player in the permanent magnet market.
Here are the 20-second highlights:
China's rare earth exports hit a four-month high in May. That is the misleading number. The line that decides leverage is being held at zero for one named ally, and no one (outside of the industry) is talking about it.
The U.S. asked China, on the record, to switch this very same ally's rare earths supply back on. China refused, and the dispute is now set for the G7 table in France.
Japan approved its first new rare earth refinery in eighteen years this week, with the government covering half the cost. Which three elements it targets is the whole point.
The allied answer hardened from aspiration into capital this week, on three continents at once, and almost none of it landed on the node that is the bottleneck.
Japan's heavy rare earth (HRE) imports have rounded to zero for months, yet its magnet lines never stopped shipping. Only two explanations fit the data, and only one of them is repeatable.
The most supply-critical material for the AI buildout this week was not a rare earth, copper, or lithium. It sits a layer below the names everyone watches, and almost nobody is hedged to it.
Sodium-ion took a real step toward large-scale grid storage this week. If it holds, the slice of lithium, nickel, and cobalt demand that rested on stationary storage is suddenly contestable, and the question is which battery-metal trade still holds.
Illustration of Shin-Etsu’s existing Magnetic Materials Research Center in Fukui, Japan
For a year, China's export controls read like a switch. On or off, the same for everyone, plain in any customs file you cared to pull.
More recently, China showed that the switch is a dial. It can be turned to zero for one named ally while the headline export number climbs to a four-month high, and only the ally on the other end ever feels it.
That quietly rewires how we should price exposure.
Grade ex-China projects by who holds the reserves, and you are measuring the wrong thing, because the risk has moved off the orebody and onto the destination code, onto whether China has chosen to keep your line open.
Japan learned this week that the answer can change without warning. The mechanism that changed it is only suspended everywhere else, set to lapse in November, which leaves one question worth more than any reserve estimate: what do you watch to see the next target before the aggregate data does?
No one wants to enter the second half of the year exposed. No one wants to take unnecessary risks. And no one wants to be forced into reactive decisions when the market shifts.
That is why anticipating risks and positioning strategically are mandatory. Wouldn’t you agree?
Upgrade to get access to this briefing and other subscriber-only content.
Subscribe for $20/month or $200/year. Cancel anytime.
Upgrade now →